DNA strand assembling from different elements. By iLexx.

More Than 1 Million of Possible ‘Genetic Molecules’ combination! The same is true for Social and Economic activities!!!

Scientists recently discovered that more than 1 million combinations of molecules could, like the DNA is doing, potentially store genetic information.
This scientific breakthrough not only demonstrates that alternative form of life, inside or outside the Solar System, could exit but more prosaically (as we are more concerned for that is happening in our Planet and as we have more responsibilities and control on it) shows us the path to discover new medical treatments and new drugs.

But years ago, and not so far back in Time, the belief, in almost all the brains of the Biologists, was that there was only one way to genetically store the information, the structure of the DNA with its combination of famous pairs made of A with G and C with T. It was seen as the only possible way to carry information. No other combination was imagined or even the mere possibility of the existence of other combinations seemed impossible. But now, thanks to the work of Henderson James Cleaves II, Christopher Butch, Pieter Buys Burger, Jay Goodwin, Markus Meringer, we know that plenty of other possibilities exist. And some of them could be more powerful than the classic DNA structure. Maybe some possible new combinations could even store genetic information in more than a double helix like in DNA. Maybe spiraling and entangling information in 4 or 6 Helixes will be possible.

So, it’s exactly the same with Human Economical and Social Activities!
They are thousands of possible organizations of Human activities through different kinds of ownership of the Land, of Natural Resources, of Factories, of Intellectual Properties, of Knowledge and so on.

Some people like to think or would like others to think that there is only one possible Economical possible organization, Liberalism with Capitalism. But in reality, there are much more possible. And many of them are more effective than Liberalism to bring prosperity and abundance to most of the inhabitants of our Planet.

COOPERACTIVE ASSETS, New COMMONS are a part of these possible new organizations.
Shareholding is not inscribed in the human genetic code!!!
It’s an Economical and Social construction.
Which was efficient at a Time, for some purposes, in specific fields of activity.
We can have now more powerful Economical and/or Social mecanisms.

All the rules, laws and customs of Humans activities are Social construction. These constructions can be influenced by religious, spiritual, philosophical or moral preferences. But in the end, there is a social convention, an agreement on HOW the collectivity should act. So the choice of Liberalism is just a mere choice of social Convention on the repartition of benefits between Shareholders who owns the means of production and the workers who don’t 🙁

But there are many other Social Conventions possible and more efficient!
Especially with COOPERACTIVE ASSETS 🙂
So let’s choose one of them, create it and made it ‘alive’!

Philippe AGRIPNIDIS
Creator of COOPERACTIVE ASSETS

Original article written in English.
Wooden footbridge over river in dutch countryside near Groningen under amazing dark sunset during a sunday afternoon stroll

What are Natural Universal COOPERATIVE ASSETS?

In order to better familiarize yourself with the notion of COOPERATIVE ASSETS, here is a short presentation, which is not intended to be exhaustive, of what are Natural COOPERATIVE ASSETS. Previously these resources were known as Natural COMMON.
But in reality, there are now, strico senso, with Human presence all around the Planet, no Natural resource per itself. Even these resources are coconstructed. By action or inaction of Humankind Civilization.
This is why it is more accurate to talk about Natural Cooperative Assets as they are under our responsability (Cooperative). And they are Assets which, if badly managed, could disappear from Earth.
So Natural Universal COOPERATIVE ASSETS are :

  1. COOPERATIVE ASSETS that are based on a natural resource, abundant or not, on Earth or elsewhere (Current limit: Solar System).
  2. The notion of Universal means, either a Common Resource present throughout the Earth (Air for example). Or a Common Resource whose benefits of exploitation must be shared by all. (i.e Gold Mine underwater outside the Territorial Waters)

Here is, therefore, on the basis of these two criteria, a beginning of the list of Universal COOPERATIVE ASSET:
– Air
– Water
– All Raw Mineral Materials in the broad sense, initially located outside Territorial Waters.
– All forms of oil (liquid, bitumen,…) and Gas (liquid, shale,…) outside the Territorial Waters initially as seen above. Parks, Reserves and biological and ecological preservation areas, such as what Australia’s Great Barrier Reef or the Amazon could be.
– Mountains that are symbolic for Human Culture such as Mount Everest, Mont Blanc, Elbrusz, Mount Ararat, Sinai, Kilimanjaro, Aconcagua, Denali, Puncak Jaya, Mount Kosciuszko to name but the highest and most culturally known. But many other Mountains, or hills, have cultural significance or are remarkable beauties to add to the list of COMMONS.
– Important Lakes and Rivers such as the Nile or the Amazon.

P.S Agricultural Resources (fields, orchards, etc…) are not among these types of Universal COOPERATIVE ASSETS.

Group of people around the world

INTERNET is definitely a COOPERACTIVE ASSET. A Digital type.

To better understand what COOPERACTIVE ASSETS, and more particularly a digital good, are, the best example to illustrate this point is to talk about the Internet. A COOPERACTIVE ASSETS is something that benefits, fairly (see point 3 below), those who can access it. In the past, COMMONS, the originators of COOPERACTIVE ASSETS, were more or less limited to local areas. And mainly to the exploitation of natural resources.

Today, when a COMMONS, a COOPERACTIVE ASSET is by itself, Universal, it can, potentially, benefit everyone. This is the great strength of the Digital COOPERACTIVE ASSETS. By their nature, they can be profitable and enjoyable for the greatest number of people. And the INTERNET is a new COOPERACTIVE ASSET. We must be aware of this. We must realize and understand that by setting and sharing universally accepted Standards, we create not only a much larger one, but new Goods / Services and Enterprises (The Internet Eco-System with GAFA and BATX). These norms (and not only standards), which have generated digital codings and vice versa, are the result of years of work and research carried out by people, mainly funded (see French Cyclades initiative), initially by the American Administration (through public funds distributed via the Army and then to universities). This Administrative entity has given time and resources to create these new COOPERACTIVE ASSETS. It required human energy, inventiveness. It was difficult. It was a pioneering process. But, in the end, she succeeded. And now, any human can enjoy the Internet. What an evolution compared to previous years!

It is the strength of COOPERACTIVE ASSETS to have both the collective level of the Community in which it is exercised developed. And also, directly, the level of prosperity of the individuals who are in this Community.

Then we can remember that:

COMMUNICATIONS are capable of creating and bringing an incredible source of prosperity to Humanity.
Let us become aware of “wealth” in all its forms, human, social, technological, financial etc…. brought by the Digital COMMONS that is the Internet through the gigantic Eco-System that it represents (From Developer- Local Website Designer to GAFAM and BATX).

What will be the next great Digital (or Natural) COOPERACTIVE ASSET that we will create together?

What new Eco-Systems can we create? Both gigantic in economic size and on a human scale?
COMMUNICATIONS are based on equity of access. This does not mean equality. Potentially, we can find this quite simply in the so-called developed countries, with access to the Internet. Potentially, any individual with access to the Internet can access it as much as they wish. That’s the fair game. The potentials are the same for all.

However, in addition to the fact that each person can spend as much time as they want, from 0 to, in theory, 24 hours a day; and that some can therefore spend more time than others; it is especially how they will use the Internet Resource that will make the difference. Some will choose to watch Cat Videos all day long[Grumpy Cat ==> Digital Regrets], others will prefer to learn about the latest science hypotheses. But at the beginning everyone has the same potential. This is what also characterizes COMMONS, or at least the COOPERACTIVE ASSETS. It is the individual action of each Member of the Community that creates for itself its own harvest, proportional to the exploitation of the Common Resource.

The Internet COOPERACTIVE ASSET, like all Digital COOPERACTIVE ASSETS, has absolutely (or almost no) shortage problems. The “consumption” of a good from the “COMMON” Internet Resource, unlike the consumption of a fish in a Common Lake, does not lead to its disappearance. Viewing a Video on the Internet does not prevent others from seeing it as well (Except when it is the exception to the rule, namely the principle of the application itself is not to allow the duration in time of the resource being viewed, see Snap Chat). And even at the same time. See the article on the subject.

Be fully aware of the enormous potential of the Digital age we are living in to develop and share new and fabulous COOPERACTIVE ASSETS.

Article Initiated on 20 March 2019.
Update on 28 May /2019 & 1 October 2019.

 

Philippe AGRIPNIDIS

Human hands with wheat ears. Crop protection and care concept

What are COMMONS ?

Usually, COMMONS are defined as Cultural and Natural resources accessible to all members of a Society.

COMMONS can be of different kinds. The most Known and Historical COMMONS are COMMONS based on NATURE (See this Post). But in reality they can now also be Economical, Social and now even Digital!

This why it’s better to talk now about COOPERACTIVE ASSETS.

COOPERACTIVE ASSET is the name of the new COMMONS, the ones that we can now create in this Digital and Global Age. But behind this new word, this denomination, we have to keep the very key principles of the originators of the COOPERACTIVE ASSETS.

The most important are the Governance and sharing outcomes mechanisms.

Indeed, Commons, COOPERACTIVE ASSETS are defined by a Community of users, whatever its size is (local, national, continental, World), which self-governs the resource and the sharing of its outcomes (whatever its form, natural, digital, social) through institutions that it creates and control.

At least, these mechanisms and spirit are now immediately needed for making a new evolution to our Civilization.

And hopefully a whole new Civilization!

Discover all the power of COOPERACTIVE ASSETS on Alpharis.

Miami Florida USA

1 example of a National COOPERACTIVE ASSET: Country Brand Image via TV Series. And how to develop it.

S

What image do soap operas give to a country?

The brand image is a National COOPERACTIVE ASSET. Yes!

The approach of COOPERACTIVE ASSETS allows us to better understand their importance for a Community. And therefore to be able to promote and enhance them in order to increase and improve the share, whether material or immaterial, that each inhabitant of the Community (As a country) receives.

An example of awareness given by this approach by COOPERACTIVE ASSETS is the brand image of a country. If we consider it as a Common Good, we can see better the impact that this COOPERACTIVE ASSET has on the daily lives of the inhabitants of the Community. Because this image determines the ECONOMIC value of the territory in which the Community is located. That the brand image of the territory be positive and the territory will be well considered.

Either for the purchase of its goods and services. Either to invest in this Territory. The brand image, (what a territory tells us), has very great importance in terms of the global economic positioning of each country. The more a territory is well considered, the more these activities (services, products) will be valued in the eyes of potential buyers. Even if they are not necessarily the cheapest items.

And by previously using the word “tells”, we put our finger on the crux of the problem. We’re going to tell a story. Often embellish it. And sometimes even invent it. Like making us believe that anyone can go to the United States to a hospital to be treated, within a minute, his sick liver without previously having sold one of his own kidneys to pay the future hospitalization bill! (See Grey’s Anatomy. Care in the USA is like the Hospital in France. No one pays according to the US Soaps! ). This is a good Story Telling. An Art that Hollywood has mastered to the best of its ability since the 1920s (with the famous Westerns in particular[To see on this point this excellent drawing:-) ],

Westerns filmed by good directors but who try to make us think of cow-keeper adventures, with guns, as Builders of magnificent Civilization! A very beautiful scam to make us forget that in 80 years, apart from the Gold Rush, where strangely enough {and not so much because it would have ended up demonstrating the great illusion that this Gold Rush was for many} there has been little film on the subject, and the massacre of indigenous Indian tribes who, until very recently, were still big bad guys, nothing structural and innovative has happened in the Wild West of the USA. Nothing of nothing. And this until the beginning of Silicon Valley or rather Orange Valley when a son decided to join his mother who had left for California for health reasons.

Because even if currently many US soap operas are shot in Canada for tax reasons, uh artistic of course, what is being promoted is not Vancouver or Quebec. It’s California or Washington State. It is always the American Way of Life, implicit or explicit, that is presented and highlighted. Hence this attraction on the minds of many people who either want to invest or come to live in the USA or California. Brand image is part of Soft Power and the USA has been organizing it for more than a century.

Thus the control or orientation of this Story Telling, mainly, first from the Cinema and now from the soap operas, especially now where viewing in streaming mode is crucial for the brand image of a Territory. And as a result, it must be organized. After defining its “History”, each country must promote itself through “Opus” in the broadest sense. This does not mean that ALL of a country’s productions are at the service of this objective. Artistic freedom, including of course the freedom to speak of ugly episodes in one’s community, must always prevail. But each country must “produce” its own story or stories.

But then how to talk about it?

Clapper

01.Which production and creation actors?

Because of the potential benefits to each of the Community’s members, which go beyond the financial interest of short-term profitability, Government, State, and National agencies are often in the best position to carry out these actions.

The natural carrier of these subjects would thus be France Télévision for France. And the BBC for England. And RAI for Italy. This applies to almost all countries. Excluding the USA where Private Actors are both the actors and beneficiaries of this Soft Power. They therefore naturally carry this objective, often unconsciously for some, of Story Telling for the benefit of Americans and America (First!). And for China, which can rely on the private sector (as in the technological sector) to support its government needs.

I have no ideas, information or intuitions (the author strives to talk only about elements on which he has a beginning of knowledge or experience [which means that he tackles very, very few subjects…]) for the possible carriers of these projects in other major nations such as Russia, Japan, Mexico or Brazil.

03. IN WHAT LANGUAGE? NATIVE or ENGLISH?

There is no ready-made answer on this point. Some countries can promote their languages by shooting directly in them. Others can use English from the beginning. It should be noted that some countries filmed in their native language without knowing that this would have an international impact (See Casa di Papel).

02. which content format?

Undeniably it is the format of the soap opera that is the preferred medium. With its notion of Episodes and Seasons (And also of Ends of Stories). It is the one that is in progress and in fashion all over the world (see Game of Thrones). Especially since Pilot episodes can be made at a lower cost to test the impact of a concept. However, films that have a strong impact can also be used as a reference for a series. Only the financial contributions of a well-made film (Understanding with enough resources for it to be well rendered on screen) is at a level higher than 10 Million Euros. An episode of a soap opera is for a few million.

It is necessary to make oneself the Model of Knowledge which is not to put all one’s eggs in the same basket. And to spread the risks of creation as much as possible by focusing on very different projects. But always at the service, not necessarily exclusive (a little subtlety does not harm), of this national brand image.

04. what type of OPUS?

It must already be confirmed that in this type of exercise, the documentary is not suitable. Not that a country’s brand image does not also pass through its exhibition in documentaries. But a), this emphasis appears more visible to the viewer in a documentary. The unconscious, the secondary effect is not present by nature in this type of format. And b) documentaries are not the most watched type of Shows. They, therefore, remain fiction in the broadest sense. For various reasons (effectiveness of the subject, possible speed of production, style appreciated internationally), we recommend starting with Contemporary Police Fictions, again in the very broad sense (investigations, police interventions, burglaries, smart scams, etc.). Other subjects than Police and/or Contemporaries are possible. But they are more difficult to determine and control. It is better to progress step by step. While giving for the promotion of his/her country a tight schedule of planned evolutions.

5. What should we show?

city of Monaco

a). Known architecture

Any remarkable Architectural element already known internationally in the Territory. With the obligation to show the iconic place or places that constitute the global signature of a country. For example, the Eiffel Tower for France. Or the Trevi Fountain, the Colosseum for Italy. Note that we can mix classical representations of these icons, basically the shot, the view, the framing that everyone knows. And a new perspective, a new angle of view little or not known to the element.

c). Remarkable natural element

Any remarkable Natural element, whether already known or not. These elements are very important for the promotion of the country. Their beauty will constitute an important enhancement of the country.

b). interesting architecture

Any remarkable Architectural element but less known at an international level. The Trocadéro in Paris is a good example. Piazza di Popolo in Roma is another one.

d). unorthodox architecture

Any unusual or mysterious Architectural element. For example, the castle of Tomar in Portugal, which is not yet very well known (Even in English Wikipedia!). Especially with its inner circular part which is not shown to date in the French Wikipedia article. An example of the impact of this type of place is the promotion of Croatia through some of the shoots in the Games of Thrones series.

But also

e). infrastructure

Infrastructure but Good quality infrastructure. Yes, even complex or modern railway bridges, viaducts or switches contribute to building a good brand image for the country.

This is a point that is often forgotten because it actually works on the unconscious of the viewer.

To understand it well, imagine watching an episode where 3/4 of the actions take place in traffic jams. What would you think of the country then? Healthy, modern, up-to-date, fast and efficient infrastructures contribute to a good brand image of the country. They must be shown and magnified.

g). factories and production equipment

This is rarely understood, even by American scriptwriters, but showing manufacturing locations and tools, machines, is important for the country’s brand image. It will be in your interest, depending on the targeted brand image, to focus on artisanal creation or on the other side of the spectrum, on ultra-modern products. In any case, the notion of Quality must appear unconsciously on the screen {Let us remember that all the elements that make up a brand image are shown in second-hand mode, in the background, in evocation. They are not the main subject of the filmed action. Otherwise, it is like propaganda with Soviet subtlety from the 20s [1920s for confirmation for some young readers]. They must be seen as elements that shape the “unconscious” of the viewer. They work on his perception in depth without being noticed.}

f). Cars

Between discussions, pursuits, escapes and other adventures, it is often a place of action. What is shown as vehicles is therefore important for the country’s brand image. Between filming a country where three-quarters of the cars look like walking wrecks and a country where almost everyone drives a sports car, the picture is not the same.

As part of this exercise, the idea and ideal are to promote cars belonging to local manufacturers, if only to promote the distribution and sale of these models abroad.

This is not always the case. It is then necessary to be careful with the vehicles filmed. But you don’t have to show only big French or German sedans.

Vivid, original, smart and rare cars can also be shown.

h). Houses

Luxurious bathroom interior

The internal decoration, the type of object, the type of household appliances, the number of rooms, their surfaces, the surface of the house, the presence of garden, swimming pool, everything is important and must be highlighted with an awareness of this importance.

And last but maybe not least for this point

Well-dressed couple in luxury bedroom interior.

i). Suits and Clothing

The way of dressing, which is not identical between the actors and actresses of the series, is also important. The role of the Costume Designer is already well established in Film.

But it must now also move towards an emphasis on local production or local style. Always by remaining at the service of the country’s brand image and promotion.

Here, the chosen illustration could be used for France or Italy.

j). Characters

And last but not least, the Characters shown in the series.

Their characters, their statures, their way of speaking, their way of moving, their type of beauty [Yes, because in a way everyone is beautiful, and nice too] everything contributes to giving actors and actresses a brand image of the country where the show is located.

6) The declinations

If the series is successful, derivatives of it may be considered. Either what are called sequences (sequel), returns in time (prequel) or parallel adventures of secondary characters (Spin-Off).

For information, not all points are covered in this article. In particular, the Knowledge Model which makes it possible to motivate, select authors in the broadest sense (scriptwriters, Show Runner, Dialogue Writer, Director) to participate as best as possible in promoting a country’s brand image. A brand image that must also result from a Knowledge Model that is specific to each country because it is relative to each country.

In any case, be convinced of the importance of a country’s brand image, whether it is transmitted and amplified by films or soap operas. That is what China has understood very well. Even if the last attempt in 2018 was not successful. But this flop doesn’t matter. Because we must apply the well-known maxim of Boileau: “go back to your work again (100 times!). Sooner or later this type of film promoting the Chinese Communist state will be successful.

It is also this type of promotion of the country that makes the inhabitants proud. With an increase in the pleasure felt by living in the Community, this creates Pride, belonging to a group, with sometimes an increase or rather valuation of real estate (because inflation in real estate prices is one of the possible perverse effects of this emphasis on brand image). Americans’ pride in being Americans comes mainly from the constant repetition of the brand image through US movies and soap operas. Even if since the 1990s, Hollywood’s rosy vision of the USA has no longer been unique and immaculate, the majority of creations carry within them a positive promotion of the USA, the American spirit and the American Way of Life.

And if you don’t like the word brand image or Story Telling, replace them with tourism promotion. It will be almost the same. You will not have in mind all the possible impacts of a brand image but you will at least be aware of a certain part.

Cinema Ticket
Cowboy Standoff low shot

Moreover, since this works well for the USA, we will wonder about the lack of a brand image of Europe as such in this niche. Because in 3 months of the History of Europe, whether in the Middle Ages, the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, the 19th and 20th centuries, there have been many more events than in 80 years of cow-keeping in the West of Pecos (In French). This lack of common discourse is an anomaly, penalizing, for an organization that defines itself as a Community. Because it is not a question of promoting each country, one by one, on a subject specific to that country alone. But to consider new adventures taking place, in the same series, on several territories of Europe.

This awareness will also lead to the emergence of new professions and jobs that will be in charge of enhancing the brand image of their country by participating, helping, controlling, improving the Scenarios but also, more directly, by participating in the shots to check what is shown and in what forms (See the points listed in the section “What should we show?”).

This profession can be called the National Brand Image Catalyst.

It should be noted that if your country does not operate under the COMMONS mode and approach, you will have an even greater need and interest to implement this promotion of your country at the level of World Competition. Not thinking about it, not applying it, is a political mistake in the noble sense of the word political.

Young screenwriter reading the script

a practical example

Finally, would you like an example of what a type of fiction can be in this context of promoting a brand image of the country?
Let’s take France at random [Chance always does things right!].
In relation to the points seen above, we will choose a series based on:

Forensic scientist examining bullet casing

On Police Investigations

This type of story has many advantages in promoting a conscious brand image.

Nice old town France
Luxury House on the French Riviera in Cassis, France

Located in Nice and its hinterland

With very nice cars and houses of the kind seen in the 80s in Miami Vice. Because there is no reason to leave the representation of luxury to American soap operas alone. (Hinterland can be seen as a broad area, up to Cassis [Sorry Marseilles 🙂 ] & Mercantour National Park.

To contrast the modern elements of the city, the old city and the surrounding nature.

Nice panorama seen from Mt Boron

Bay of Nice and a Nice Bay!

View on the Sea Front

Nice old town France

Old City of Nice

View from the inland

It will also be necessary to use the Monaco context in certain intrigues (13 miles between the 2 cities!).

Port Hercule in Monaco at sunrise Green Poker Table

With all the usual symbols of the Principality.

Plus, also the Formula 1 Grand Prix.

Portofino village on Ligurian coast, Italy

As well as the notion of a border with Italy.

And his famous Riviera. Even the Cinque Terre.

Highlight luxurious elements such as yachts, cars, suits.

Luxury boat

A Soft Power tool

Modest and reasonable.

Happy friends eating fruits and drinking on a yacht

While highlighting the human and solidarity aspect of the inhabitants

if possible by continuing to highlight the tools previously seen… (Yacht, Cars, Suits)

With the advantage of French life always put forward {All an Art without a doubt!}, food, sun, etc….

Baker putting baguette in paper bag

As in figure skating, all the great compulsory and expected figures will be present!

And the (positive) clichĂ©s too 🙂

It will also be necessary to have an International name that sounds good. In this context, the author proposes,

Be

Yachts in the cannes bay at night

If we prefer to place the action in the city of the Festival, we can of course use the now famous

Yes you

Each element shown on the screen will be important.

Everything must be thought out, designed and prepared in advance to promote this National brand image.

Links
Great idea concept with crumpled colorful paper and light bulb
Great idea concept with crumpled colorful paper and light bulb on black background

These types of actions, as well as those of Defining a brand image of a country and its main elements to be implemented, are part of the Consulting and Audit Services of Alpharis.

ALPHARIS

Manufacture of COOPERACTIVE ASSETS

The dawn of 3D Printing

COOPERACTIVE ASSETS Tools- Let’s stop having funny-fun-fun with Personal 3D Printers!

The COOPERACTIVE ASSETS, the New Commons also use powerful and shared Collective tools.
It is these tools that we must promote. And to do so, we must accelerate and facilitate their invention, their diffusion and the increase of their capacities.

In this type of tool, 3D Printers, in the very broadest sense, polymers, plastic, metal, textile and others to come (Food, Biological…), are the KEY tools for the implementation of the New Civilization. It is for this reason that we must bring to their design the greatest concentration and energy. And in the design, the notion of use in the form of COOPERACTIVE ASSET must become essential. We must orient and focus these practices in the direction of the Collective and Local Autonomy.

Because we will not change Civilization by continuing to develop Printers for mainly personal use whose main objective seems to be that everyone can reprint in 3D the missing Lego from their Millennium Falcon collection. We have to get away from the idea where each of us equips himself with his own personal printer to make funny-fun-fun with it once every 36 of the month (I Know it’s only a French expression non-translatable ) to replace a lost screw of a piece of furniture with Scandinavian origins.

We must request and support the development of 3D Printer as a strategic tool for the implementation of COOPERACTIVE ASSETS at the local level. This implies that these 3D printers change scale three times over.

  1. A larger scope.
    The reference will become a use for a building, a street or a district.
  2. A mode of collective ownership.
    The printer is reserved for members, members of associations, citizens etc. and no one will control its ownership.
  3. Wider capacities in usable materials.
    These materials will eventually be of all types currently available in Industry and Laboratory prototype (including 3D printing of human organs). If this eventually reveals a relevant idea]).

To this end, the establishment of Standards and compatibility so that plans, designs, files are shared (with fair remuneration of authors, involving, if necessary, use protection mechanisms, without remuneration if the authors so decide) is also a Priority for Action.

Print Templates must be created and shared on a global scale.
The printing itself must be done at the local level.

This is typically representative of the spirit of the COOPERACTIVE ASSETS  where Knowledge is shared among all, on a Universal scale. And where the realization is on a human scale, at the local level, by local actors for the benefit of the people living there.

We must therefore, from now on, imagine 3D Printers in these new scales and in this spirit. Printers with the ability to create the objects of our future responsible modern world with a high durability of the objects and a total recycling capacity of the created elements.

3D printers that can produce body parts of our future ecological cars, engine parts that will power them, parts of our refrigerators, ovens, furniture, phone screens, clothes, etc…. Any everyday object will possibly have to be printable by these shared tools. This capacity is vital for the establishment of this New Civilization which is possible if we wish it deep down in our hearts.

It is therefore necessary to move from the ability to create Lego parts through his own small printer, to go beyond the ego, to be able to go to the powerful collective from which everyone benefits and benefits.

Philippe AGRIPNIDIS